http://www.datoolset.net/mw/api.php?action=feedcontributions&feedformat=atom&user=Arkenor+Oakshadow 2026-05-09T12:07:21Z User contributions MediaWiki 1.25.6 http://www.datoolset.net/mw/index.php?title=Talk:Creatureranks.xls&diff=7561 2009-11-10T11:36:17Z

<p>Arkenor Oakshadow: </p> <hr /> <div>Are we sure this is correct? This document says that s4 on the as_data page is Magic, but just looking at the creatureranks.xls in our source folder, it has warriors having a much higher number in s4 than the mages. - Arkenor Oakshadow, confused.<br /> Actually, after further study, I'm guessing high numbers are bad, and low numbers are good somehow. Could really do with a little documentation of exactly what they mean though. - Arkenor Oakshadow</div>

Arkenor Oakshadow http://www.datoolset.net/mw/index.php?title=Talk:Creatureranks.xls&diff=7560 2009-11-10T11:11:32Z

<p>Arkenor Oakshadow: </p> <hr /> <div>Are we sure this is correct? This document says that s4 on the as_data page is Magic, but just looking at the creatureranks.xls in our source folder, it has warriors having a much higher number in s4 than the mages. - Arkenor Oakshadow, confused.</div>

Arkenor Oakshadow http://www.datoolset.net/mw/index.php?title=Talk:Creatureranks.xls&diff=7559 2009-11-10T11:10:11Z

<p>Arkenor Oakshadow: Some doubts as to the accuracy of this document.</p> <hr /> <div>Are we sure this is correct? This document says that s4 on the as_data page is Magic, but just looking at the creatureranks.xls in our source folder, it has warriors having a much higher number in s4 than the mages.</div>

Arkenor Oakshadow