Dragon Age Toolset Wiki talk:Community Portal - Revision history

Sunjammer: Removed spam

2011-04-21T20:27:48Z

Removed spam

Liza1314: /* bw_dragonage_content says its 'restoring' */

2011-04-19T03:59:39Z

‎bw_dragonage_content says its 'restoring'

AzraelKane: /* bw_dragonage_content says its 'restoring' */ new section

2011-01-25T02:06:57Z

‎bw_dragonage_content says its 'restoring': new section

Sunjammer: /* Huh? */ new section

2009-11-26T21:30:00Z

‎Huh?: new section

Reynen Starfyre: /* Adding a new class in DA */

2009-11-26T16:48:23Z

‎Adding a new class in DA

Reynen Starfyre: /* Adding a new class in DA */ new section

2009-11-26T16:47:59Z

‎Adding a new class in DA: new section

BryanDerksen: /* Google */

2009-11-25T21:35:44Z

‎Google

Illyism: Created page with '== Add a new topic by creating a new header like this one == And then write your comment below it. Sign your comment with four tildes, like so: ~~~~. It is auto...'

2009-11-25T10:02:09Z

Created page with '== Add a new topic by creating a new header like this one == And then write your comment below it. Sign your comment with four tildes, like so: <nowiki>~~~~</nowiki>. It is auto...'

New page

== Add a new topic by creating a new header like this one ==

And then write your comment below it. Sign your comment with four tildes, like so: <nowiki>~~~~</nowiki>. It is automatically substituted with your user name and a link to your user page.

:To respond to someone else's comment, use a colon at the beginning of your response to indent it.

::Two colons indent twice, and so forth.

== NDA ==
I suspect that the NDA no longer applies to the Wiki, since the latter does not touch on the three topics that Chris Priestly asked us not to discuss in his e-mail of 13-Jul-2009.
[[User:Proleric1|Proleric1]] 09:42, 25 July 2009 (UTC)
:Surely no NDA applies now, as the wiki is in the public domain? [[User:Proleric1|Proleric1]] 07:47, 15 October 2009 (UTC)
::Probably not. I'll ask around to make sure, though. [[User:BryanDerksen|BryanDerksen]] 19:44, 15 October 2009 (UTC)
::I've been asked to ask you to hold off on talking about the wiki until next week, to help spread the "buzz" out a bit. Right now everyone's talking about character creator, we don't want to distract from that. The folks who busted their humps on CC need their due. [[User:BryanDerksen|BryanDerksen]] 15:07, 16 October 2009 (UTC)
::Heh. I see Sunjammer just posted about the wiki on the forum, directing people here. Oh well. :) [[User:BryanDerksen|BryanDerksen]] 15:41, 16 October 2009 (UTC)

==Ten Minute Tutorials==
I think we should create a category and or easily accessible launch page where people can contribute quick 10 minute tutorials on a variety of subjects [[User:Allan Smith|Allan Smith]] 01:54, 13 November 2009 (UTC)

== Google ==

The Wiki isn't accessible unless you have a Bioware social account; are there exceptions for Googlebot? I understand wanting to protect the contents but being searchable is a great way to be found. --[[User:Talonius|Talonius]] 04:30, 17 November 2009 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:27, 21 April 2011
Line 27:		Line 27:

	This "discussion" appears to be nothing more than a duplication of sections arbitrarily copied (not moved) from [[Talk:Main_Page]]. In addition the actual "primary discussion forum" for wiki editors is presumably the [http://social.bioware.com/group/239/ Dragon Age Toolset Wiki Editors] group. So what is the actual role of the Community Portal page going to be? It's all very well for someone to randomly declare it to be X but if we have no intention to use it for X then it is redundant and/or misleading. I have started a [http://social.bioware.com/group/239/discussion/2016/ thread] to discuss this further --[[User:Sunjammer\|Sunjammer]] 21:30, 26 November 2009 (UTC)		This "discussion" appears to be nothing more than a duplication of sections arbitrarily copied (not moved) from [[Talk:Main_Page]]. In addition the actual "primary discussion forum" for wiki editors is presumably the [http://social.bioware.com/group/239/ Dragon Age Toolset Wiki Editors] group. So what is the actual role of the Community Portal page going to be? It's all very well for someone to randomly declare it to be X but if we have no intention to use it for X then it is redundant and/or misleading. I have started a [http://social.bioware.com/group/239/discussion/2016/ thread] to discuss this further --[[User:Sunjammer\|Sunjammer]] 21:30, 26 November 2009 (UTC)
−
−	Abercrombie and Fitch outfits are produced for kids, grownup males and women. http://www.kaufenviviennewestwood.com/vivienne-westwood-online.html They are in the large amount and there is something for every one individual within their meticulously finished pieces. They have obtained relatively worthwhile selections on essential appears that provide an all-time look. They provide standard tops for kids, ladies and men. These appear in every one sizing as well as they are definitely a genius purpose of very creative designers. They've beautiful hoods and sweats to the youthful at center and these appear in several prints. http://www.kaufenviviennewestwood.com/vivienne-westwood-reize.html Abercrombie and Fitch outfits consist of traditional polos and premium sweaters for all. In addition, they element vintage outerwear and A&F leggings.http://www.kaufenviviennewestwood.com/vivienne-westwood-broschen.html Their jeans are definitely exceptional to the remainder and individuals will obtain worth for their cash.
−
−	Women will appear stylish within your Abercrombie clothing choice which provides all period of your time dresses. There is something to the beach, http://www.buycheapthomasonline.com/thomas-sabo-uk.html
−	to the workplace and for just about any tranquil afternoon within your park. Swim fit on is among the their choice as well as the styles are varied. There is something in collection with one another with your taste and preference. for all those people casual outfits to the outdoors, Abercrombie and Fitch outfits have used treatment of that detail. They have relatively numerous denim shorts and skirts. http://www.buycheapthomasonline.com/thomas-sabo-online-shop.html The pastime lover can have several athletic shorts to pick out from. additionally they concentrate on finest butt sweat jeans which come going to be the in element using the greater youthful now. leather-based sandals are made within their quantities and one will possible be spoiled for choice.

@@ Line 28: / Line 28: @@
 This "discussion" appears to be nothing more than a duplication of sections arbitrarily copied (not moved) from [[Talk:Main_Page]].  In addition the actual "primary discussion forum" for wiki editors is presumably the [http://social.bioware.com/group/239/ Dragon Age Toolset Wiki Editors] group.  So what is the actual role of the Community Portal page going to be? It's all very well for someone to randomly declare it to be X but if we have no intention to use it for X then it is redundant and/or misleading.  I have started a [http://social.bioware.com/group/239/discussion/2016/ thread] to discuss this further  --[[User:Sunjammer|Sunjammer]] 21:30, 26 November 2009 (UTC)
-== bw_dragonage_content says its 'restoring'  ==
+Abercrombie and Fitch outfits are produced for kids, grownup males and women. http://www.kaufenviviennewestwood.com/vivienne-westwood-online.html They are in the large amount and there is something for every one individual within their meticulously finished pieces. They have obtained relatively worthwhile selections on essential appears that provide an all-time look. They provide standard tops for kids, ladies and men. These appear in every one sizing as well as they are definitely a genius purpose of very creative designers. They've beautiful hoods and sweats to the youthful at center and these appear in several prints. http://www.kaufenviviennewestwood.com/vivienne-westwood-reize.html Abercrombie and Fitch outfits consist of traditional polos and premium sweaters for all. In addition, they element vintage outerwear and A&F leggings.http://www.kaufenviviennewestwood.com/vivienne-westwood-broschen.html  Their jeans are definitely exceptional to the remainder and individuals will obtain worth for their cash.
-i hvae tried dozens of times to get this toolset to run but the bw_dragonage_content db keeps saying its 'restoring'. there is no file to restore as far as i can tell.  ive let it 'restore' for hours with no results?  how do i make it create the db without it trying to 'restore' it?
+Women will appear stylish within your Abercrombie clothing choice which provides all period of your time dresses. There is something to the beach, http://www.buycheapthomasonline.com/thomas-sabo-uk.html

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:06, 25 January 2011
Line 27:		Line 27:

	This "discussion" appears to be nothing more than a duplication of sections arbitrarily copied (not moved) from [[Talk:Main_Page]]. In addition the actual "primary discussion forum" for wiki editors is presumably the [http://social.bioware.com/group/239/ Dragon Age Toolset Wiki Editors] group. So what is the actual role of the Community Portal page going to be? It's all very well for someone to randomly declare it to be X but if we have no intention to use it for X then it is redundant and/or misleading. I have started a [http://social.bioware.com/group/239/discussion/2016/ thread] to discuss this further --[[User:Sunjammer\|Sunjammer]] 21:30, 26 November 2009 (UTC)		This "discussion" appears to be nothing more than a duplication of sections arbitrarily copied (not moved) from [[Talk:Main_Page]]. In addition the actual "primary discussion forum" for wiki editors is presumably the [http://social.bioware.com/group/239/ Dragon Age Toolset Wiki Editors] group. So what is the actual role of the Community Portal page going to be? It's all very well for someone to randomly declare it to be X but if we have no intention to use it for X then it is redundant and/or misleading. I have started a [http://social.bioware.com/group/239/discussion/2016/ thread] to discuss this further --[[User:Sunjammer\|Sunjammer]] 21:30, 26 November 2009 (UTC)
		+
		+	== bw_dragonage_content says its 'restoring' ==
		+
		+	i hvae tried dozens of times to get this toolset to run but the bw_dragonage_content db keeps saying its 'restoring'. there is no file to restore as far as i can tell. ive let it 'restore' for hours with no results? how do i make it create the db without it trying to 'restore' it?

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:30, 26 November 2009
Line 23:		Line 23:

	: Good idea, I'll pass it along to Jesse to see if such an exception is easy/possible. [[User:BryanDerksen\|BryanDerksen]] 21:35, 25 November 2009 (UTC)		: Good idea, I'll pass it along to Jesse to see if such an exception is easy/possible. [[User:BryanDerksen\|BryanDerksen]] 21:35, 25 November 2009 (UTC)
		+
		+	== Huh? ==
		+
		+	This "discussion" appears to be nothing more than a duplication of sections arbitrarily copied (not moved) from [[Talk:Main_Page]]. In addition the actual "primary discussion forum" for wiki editors is presumably the [http://social.bioware.com/group/239/ Dragon Age Toolset Wiki Editors] group. So what is the actual role of the Community Portal page going to be? It's all very well for someone to randomly declare it to be X but if we have no intention to use it for X then it is redundant and/or misleading. I have started a [http://social.bioware.com/group/239/discussion/2016/ thread] to discuss this further --[[User:Sunjammer\|Sunjammer]] 21:30, 26 November 2009 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:48, 26 November 2009
Line 23:		Line 23:

	: Good idea, I'll pass it along to Jesse to see if such an exception is easy/possible. [[User:BryanDerksen\|BryanDerksen]] 21:35, 25 November 2009 (UTC)		: Good idea, I'll pass it along to Jesse to see if such an exception is easy/possible. [[User:BryanDerksen\|BryanDerksen]] 21:35, 25 November 2009 (UTC)
−
−	~~== Adding a new class in DA ==~~
−
−	~~Testing format~~
−
−	~~[[User:Reynen Starfyre\|Reynen Starfyre]] 16:47, 26 November 2009 (UTC) Reynen~~

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:47, 26 November 2009
Line 23:		Line 23:

	: Good idea, I'll pass it along to Jesse to see if such an exception is easy/possible. [[User:BryanDerksen\|BryanDerksen]] 21:35, 25 November 2009 (UTC)		: Good idea, I'll pass it along to Jesse to see if such an exception is easy/possible. [[User:BryanDerksen\|BryanDerksen]] 21:35, 25 November 2009 (UTC)
		+
		+	== Adding a new class in DA ==
		+
		+	Testing format
		+
		+	[[User:Reynen Starfyre\|Reynen Starfyre]] 16:47, 26 November 2009 (UTC) Reynen

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:35, 25 November 2009
Line 21:		Line 21:

	The Wiki isn't accessible unless you have a Bioware social account; are there exceptions for Googlebot? I understand wanting to protect the contents but being searchable is a great way to be found. --[[User:Talonius\|Talonius]] 04:30, 17 November 2009 (UTC)		The Wiki isn't accessible unless you have a Bioware social account; are there exceptions for Googlebot? I understand wanting to protect the contents but being searchable is a great way to be found. --[[User:Talonius\|Talonius]] 04:30, 17 November 2009 (UTC)
		+
		+	: Good idea, I'll pass it along to Jesse to see if such an exception is easy/possible. [[User:BryanDerksen\|BryanDerksen]] 21:35, 25 November 2009 (UTC)